![Dmg mantle of spell resistance in life Dmg mantle of spell resistance in life](/uploads/1/3/3/9/133909967/740001524.jpg)
Fire Resistance Frost Resistance Arcane Resistance Shadow Resistance Nature Resistance. When you have resistance gear, you take less damage from that school of magic. So, if my mage has on all shadow resistance gear and you shoot your shadow damage wand at me, I will not take 100% damage. Lets say the wand does 10 shadow damage max. Mantle of Spell Resistance (A) - advantage on all spell saves, nice if you're not already a gnome. Amulet of Health (A) - bonus hit points and better concentration checks is cool, but I think the other choices above are WAY more interesting. https://campaignever357.weebly.com/dmg-mori-seiki-co.html. Spell resistance (SR) is a special defensive ability that allows a creature or item to resist the effects of spells and spell-like abilities. Essentially it is an amount of armor class against spells. Contentsshow NWN2 Implementation Many spells have spell resistance checks where the caster.
Now the improvements regarding spell dmg really make the set attractive even for fire mages. https://campaignever357.weebly.com/download-java-for-mac-os-x.html. Now I have +350 spelldmg with very nice stats (compared with 430 spelldmg of my dmg set). So this set is really worth now for using it for boss fights and even in everyday life ^^. Crit or dmg ranged terraria.
Dmg Mantle Of Spell Resistance 5e
PvP only (you do 15000 tooltip direct DMG and 15280 debuff)
- at 15000 armor, you will have ignored their armor. If they have 20% in ironclad and 10% in Hardy, they will have 64% total mitigation. (5544 DMG)
- at 18000 armor debuff, same buffs, 65% total mitigation (5316 DMG)
- at 21000 armor, same CP buffs, they will have 67% total mitigation. (5065 DMG)
- at 26000 armor, same buffs, they will have 69.8% total mitigation. (4646 DMG)
Now let's look at a 10k debuff:
- 15000 armor, 66% mitigation (5125 DMG)
- 18k, 68% mitigation (4874 DMG)
- 21k, 69% mitigation (4623 DMG)
- 26k, 72% mitigation (4204 dmg )
And now a 8k debuff:
- 15k, 67% mitigation (4958)
- 18k, 69% mitigation (4706)
- 21k, 71% mitigation (4455)
- 26k, 73% mitigation (4036)
Based on that, it looks like a 2% reduction to their total mitigation. But looking at the DMG hurting your 15000 resist target, adding 5280 pen will add about 419 DMG to your burst number. Major breach/fracture will give you that extra DMG.
While a low amount, if they didn't use a shield or high impen, you could be looking at a higher initial DMG and in turn a higher burst. If you try to stack higher than 10k, without a debuff mechanic, you'll have to choose between reducing elfborn or reducing your dmg mitigation stars. At high CP levels you might be able to give up some points, but overwise you still need 155 points total for minimum offense (and 75 points left over)
Conclusion:
10k pen in PvP seems to be ideal. After that, you'll give up too much DMG/crit to capitalize on the DMG bonus and before 10k you'll do less DMG on the target. This means less crit and less burst DMG. Using a debuff spell will give you extra burst without giving up on stats so that's why I say aim for 10k pen in PvP.
I'm sure someone can write a better summary (especially with showing exactly how increasing the DMG is at 7-8k pen compared to using 10k pen and a 5280 debuff), but that's how I feel about penetration versus DMG in PvP. As a Templar my DMG tooltips are not high compared to nightblades, so taking spell erosion away and adding another 2-3% in tham/master didn't make much sense since adding 5280 pen was giving me more DMG.
Also shields/block weren't calculated. But then again, shields can be cc'd to prevent recasting and with the changes to some abilities going through block I imagine block not being much of an issue.
- at 15000 armor, you will have ignored their armor. If they have 20% in ironclad and 10% in Hardy, they will have 64% total mitigation. (5544 DMG)
- at 18000 armor debuff, same buffs, 65% total mitigation (5316 DMG)
- at 21000 armor, same CP buffs, they will have 67% total mitigation. (5065 DMG)
- at 26000 armor, same buffs, they will have 69.8% total mitigation. (4646 DMG)
Now let's look at a 10k debuff:
- 15000 armor, 66% mitigation (5125 DMG)
- 18k, 68% mitigation (4874 DMG)
- 21k, 69% mitigation (4623 DMG)
- 26k, 72% mitigation (4204 dmg )
And now a 8k debuff:
- 15k, 67% mitigation (4958)
- 18k, 69% mitigation (4706)
- 21k, 71% mitigation (4455)
- 26k, 73% mitigation (4036)
Based on that, it looks like a 2% reduction to their total mitigation. But looking at the DMG hurting your 15000 resist target, adding 5280 pen will add about 419 DMG to your burst number. Major breach/fracture will give you that extra DMG.
While a low amount, if they didn't use a shield or high impen, you could be looking at a higher initial DMG and in turn a higher burst. If you try to stack higher than 10k, without a debuff mechanic, you'll have to choose between reducing elfborn or reducing your dmg mitigation stars. At high CP levels you might be able to give up some points, but overwise you still need 155 points total for minimum offense (and 75 points left over)
Conclusion:
10k pen in PvP seems to be ideal. After that, you'll give up too much DMG/crit to capitalize on the DMG bonus and before 10k you'll do less DMG on the target. This means less crit and less burst DMG. Using a debuff spell will give you extra burst without giving up on stats so that's why I say aim for 10k pen in PvP.
I'm sure someone can write a better summary (especially with showing exactly how increasing the DMG is at 7-8k pen compared to using 10k pen and a 5280 debuff), but that's how I feel about penetration versus DMG in PvP. As a Templar my DMG tooltips are not high compared to nightblades, so taking spell erosion away and adding another 2-3% in tham/master didn't make much sense since adding 5280 pen was giving me more DMG.
Also shields/block weren't calculated. But then again, shields can be cc'd to prevent recasting and with the changes to some abilities going through block I imagine block not being much of an issue.